Home | Matthew Blaylock | Everett Mugg | Kevin Carver | Jack Lewis | Joe Jacobs | Jay Staton | Jay Maddox | Lisa Fowler | Debbi Willis | James Langley | News

Great SCOT—Yet Another New NASCAR Racecar?

 

March 22, 2007

Jay Staton - SCR

 

Bristol is coming, Bristol is coming! It is like a Holiday. NASCAR’s finest on a high banked short track. What could be better? 

 

The cars of course! The cars will be the “Car of Tomorrow”, which sort of becomes simply the car of today. Sunday cannot get here soon enough. This will be a true wild card, and I suspect that the race will look a lot more like the races at Bristol of the eighties. Presumably they have plenty of extra splitters in the truck and the track blowers are being tuned up, anticipating extra duty. 

 

The best of all is that while it is Bristol and there will be close racing and no doubt some rumpled sheet metal and nerves, I am convinced that the racing will be better while simultaneously the cars will be safer for the drivers. In other words, this weekend’s COT debut is an undeniable win-win for everybody. 

 

Soon the COT will be run full time, and the whole discussion will be a moot point. It was a big deal when they phased out the 1977 Cutlass for “smaller” cars (like the mid-eighties Monte Carlo), but it is a safe bet that you haven’t heard about it lately.

     

RSRForum.jpg

 

This also will largely negate the interloping of Cup stars into the Sportsman, er, Busch, er whatever-it-will-be-named-next series. Hurrah will say the nay-sayers, except… The Busch Series will have trouble getting a good car count, as the Cup Teams have put more than a few Busch regulars out of business.  

 

Before this weekend, having Cup Teams in Busch was good business for everyone except the very teams that made up the Busch Series. Cup Teams and Cup drivers effectively got more practice, and Busch races drew a bigger crowd to see the Cup drivers, but if all of that largely goes away after the advent of the Car of Tomorrow, what next? 

 

Meanwhile the Busch cars themselves are kind of boring. For you newer fans, NASCAR’s second tier series used to be called the “Sportsman” division, and unlike what was then called the Grand National Division, it was pretty much a run-what-ya-brung deal.  A 1961 Pontiac “bubbletop” coupe with a later model 427 cubic inch Chevrolet motor racing against a 1953 Studebaker with a Chrysler Hemi was not uncommon. And these were not the fifties; these were real tube chassis race cars in the sixties. 

 

This era was followed by the V6’s in mid sized cars, which sounded weak and had a problem with their oil pans not being structural enough to hold the engines internals when they frequently detonated. 

 

Those were replaced by the current car, which has an incrementally shorter wheelbase that a Cup car but which looks identical to a Cup car. What? That’s right race fans, three series, two of which look alike, at the top levels of our sport. Two of the factories (think $$, Brian France) have chosen to market the Impala and Avenger as their COT models. This is not an accident. They are effectively getting double the marketing bang for their buck. 

 

Finally, and most disturbingly, what seems to be the plan for the retired Car-of-Yesterday Cup cars is that they will be sold to the Busch Teams.  

 

Let’s, recap, shall we? The Cup Teams have monopolized the Busch Series, then left it a shell of what it was before they arrived, and now they are selling them their used and more dangerous cars, all with NASCAR’s blessing. This cannot be the right thing to do. 

 

But wait—there is an excellent way out. Come up with a New Busch Car as well! The Ford Mustang is a beautiful car, and so will be the Dodge Challenger and Chevrolet Camaro. In the sixties, these cars were known as “Sporty” cars, because they were almost a sports car, yet they had 4 seats. NASCAR could call it the “Sporty Car of Tomorrow” or SCOT! Toyota no doubt will bring a Supra to the party.

   

SCR is looking for writers in all the series we cover, if interested email us at scr@stockcarreview.com to receive further information.
 

 

It would take much less development time to hit the track than the original COT. Same basic chassis, same width, height etc, as the COT, but shorten the wheelbase a bit more than what is currently, and the trunk lid as well. Change the fascias and increase the wing size if necessary to get the stability back and there you have it! Everybody wins. Fans have something different to watch—different cars with mostly different drivers, the manufacturers are finally racing cars that fans might actually WANT to buy, and the driver’s are in a safer environment. 

 

So while NASCAR proudly holds up the COT as a safer car, will they do anything about the old Busch car, or grab and run with the SCOT idea? 

 

Perhaps, perhaps not, but the point is that they are in fact trying to improve.  

 

It is easy to be judgmental of the sanctioning body, equally easy to be judgmental of the people that we deal with on a day to day basis. We believe that we are “better” in some way, usually morally. But like the standards for the sanctioning body that journalists (this writer included) like to set for NASCAR, the Standards that have been set for us all are even higher, in fact impossibly high.  

 

Fortunately, day after day we have the choice of Eternal Hope available, and we certainly also can hope and lead, rather than criticize, those we love and associate with.  

 

In that light, NASCAR, thank you for the Car of Tomorrow. Give the SCOT serious consideration for the same good reasons that we have the COT to look forward to: Safety and better racing, and of course, it is the Right Thing to do.

 

Questions, Comments;

Email Jay 

 

The views and opinions in this article are that of the writer(s) and not necessarily that of SCR
 
 
Print

Enter content here

Enter content here

Enter content here

Born on: July 8, 2005

Copyright Symbol 2006 StockCar Review.